News ID: 272675
Published: 0412 GMT August 10, 2020

Community-based sampling needed for COVID-19 control, say researchers

Community-based sampling needed for COVID-19 control, say researchers
research-live.com

Researchers in the UK have warned that it will be essential to carry out community-based sampling in addition to symptomatic testing if the ongoing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is going to be properly understood and controlled.

Both types of testing will be needed to accurately inform the test, trace, and isolate practices designed to monitor and control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, they say, news-medical.net reported.

The team’s study found that since lockdown was eased in England at the end of May, the number of people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 did continue to fall.

On comparing two rounds of sample collection —    one carried out during May and one in June/early July — the number of positive samples was significantly lower in the second round, although the decline in infection rate was not rapid.

However, the Real-Time Assessment of Community Transmission (REACT) antigens study also showed that as the prevalence of infection continued to decline, there was an age-and occupation-associated shift in patterns of infection.

The results also suggested that people of black and Asian ethnicities and people who lived in London were at an increased risk of being infected.

The researchers, from Imperial College London, Lancaster University and the University of Oxford, said the study highlights the importance of conducting community-based, as well as symptomatic testing.

 

Implementation and relaxation of lockdown

 

Since the first cases of SARS-C0V-2 infection were identified in Wuhan, China, late last year, the virus has infected approximately 19.73 million people and killed more than 728,000 worldwide.

Many governments responded to the rapid transmission rates by implementing lockdown measures and social distancing and isolation policies.

In some countries, such measures have successfully prevented the overloading of health care services and reduced rates of clinically confirmed cases.

The full lockdown was imposed in the UK on March 23, which was followed by an initial peak in estimated infection rates and then a sustained decline in cases, hospital admissions, and mortality. The government started to ease lockdown in England at the end of May.

To accurately assess the effects of lockdown and its relaxation, surveillance needs to be independent of care seeking and testing capacities, said Steven Riley, from Imperial College London, and colleagues.

“Case-based surveillance is necessarily biased towards symptomatic individuals and sensitive to varying patterns of reporting in space and time,” wrote the team.

 

Overcoming the limitations of case-based surveillance

 

The REACT study was designed to overcome these problems by acquiring data on nose and throat swab testing, as well as personal, demographic, and symptom data among a representative community-based sample that included asymptomatic people. The study was carried out across 315 lower tier local authority areas.

The first round of sample collection, which was conducted between May 1 and June 1, identified 159 positive samples among 120,610 swabs tested. The second round, which was carried out in mid-June/early July, identified 123 positive samples among 159,199 swabs tested.

This suggested a downward trend in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence, from 0.13 percent to 0.077 percent, corresponding to an average halving time in the growth rate of 38 days and yielding a reproduction number (RO) of 0.89.

 

Many asymptomatic people tested positive

 

The proportion of people who tested positive and were asymptomatic when samples were collected increased from 69 percent in the first round to 81 percent in the second round.

“The high proportion of swab-positive individuals not reporting recent symptoms in both rounds 1 and 2 would be missed by symptom-based surveillance and therefore are a potential source of ongoing transmission that would escape case-based interventions,” wrote the team.

 

The situation improved for health care staff, home care workers and 18-24 year-olds

 

The number of health care staff and home care workers who tested swab-positive during round one was much higher than among other groups of workers. However, the odds of these workers being at an increased likelihood of infection over other groups was significantly reduced in round two.

“This result most likely reflects improvements in infection control in health care and care home settings,” suggested the team. 

Age patterns of infection shifted between the rounds of sample collection, with the prevalence among 18 to 24 year-olds decreasing fivefold in round two, compared with round one.

Compared with people aged 35 to 44 years, people aged 18 to 24 were at a 96 percent greater likelihood of infection in round one and a 64 percent greater likelihood in round two.

 

Increased risk among blacks, Asians and people living in London

 

The study also identified an increased risk of infection among people of black and Asian ethnicities at the end of lockdown, which the authors said is consistent with other studies showing that these groups are at a higher risk for adverse outcomes.

Riley and the team say further studies are needed to establish the extent to which this increased risk of adverse health outcomes can be explained by differential rates of infection.

Of the nine English regions included in the study, the greatest risk for infection was observed for London.

“Although the epidemic was geographically diffuse at the time of our study, SARS-CoV-2 transmission first took off in London,” wrote the team. “Therefore, higher prevalence in London at the end of lockdown suggests that regional rates of decline were similar.”

The researchers emphasize that the current primary control strategy in the UK is to test, trace and isolate cases and to carefully monitor the incidence of local cases so that any further restrictions on social interactions are applied at a local level.

“Community-based, as well as symptomatic testing, is essential to inform these strategies,” concluded the team.

   
KeyWords
 
Comments
Comment
Name:
Email:
Comment:
Security Key:
Captcha refresh
Page Generated in 0/5906 sec