0303 GMT April 21, 2021
Pitching for Chabahar in the INSTC, which goes via Iran’s biggest port Bandar Abbas, Jaishankar proposed that the land route via Kabul and Tashkent would form the INSTC’s “Eastern corridor”, thehindu.com wrote.
“Establishing an eastern corridor through Afghanistan would maximize its potential. India has also proposed the inclusion of Chabahar in the INSTC route. I am hopeful that during the INSTC Coordination Council meeting, member states would agree to the expansion of the INSTC route to include Chabahar port and also agree on expanding the membership of this project,” Jaishankar said at a “Chabahar Day” event organized as part of the three-day “Maritime India” summit that was conducted virtually.
The event saw participation from several regional officials including ministers from Afghanistan, Armenia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Russia and Uzbekistan.
The port has already handled 123 vessels and 180,000 tons of cargo, said an official statement issued after the conference, which include transshipments from “Russia, Brazil, Thailand, Germany, Ukraine and the UAE”.
Predicting that Chabahar will change the “geo-economy” of the region, Iran’s Minister of Roads and Urban Development Mohammed Eslami called for assistance from India in developing the project, both through the provision of cranes and other equipment at the port as well as rail tracks, signal and switching equipment for the Chabahar-Zahedan railway project.
In a letter last November, Iran had also asked India to activate the $150-million credit line it offered during Iranian President Rouhani’s visit to Delhi in 2018 for the project.
“I hope we can enjoy more credit lines allocated by India for equipping the port as well as completion of infrastructure projects of transport networks related to it,” Eslami said at the conference.
“India has participated in the first phase of development of Shahid Beheshti Port of Chabahar and we are now witnessing the supplying of equipment. It is deemed necessary for the Indian operator to facilitate the process of supplying the remaining equipment,” he said.
India has already provided the Shahid Beheshti Port with two cranes, and promised a further six, but it is not at present part of the 628-km railway project, which Iran decided to develop on its own last year.
In a reply to Parliament in February, the Ministry of External Affairs said it “remains engaged” in discussions on the subject of the 2016 MoU on the railway project, which is believed to have been stalled for the past few years due to sanctions from the US under the Trump administration.
New Delhi’s push to include Chabahar in the INSTC could also have been made with an eye on the new Biden administration’s push for restoring talks with Iran on the JCPOA nuclear agreement, and the possible easing of some sanctions.
Asked about the possibility of including Chabahar in the corridor, an Iranian official said Iran would “welcome it,” but that, procedurally, it is the INSTC Governing Council that would have to review the proposal and clear it.
The INSTC project was originally decided between India, Iran and Russia in 2000 in St Petersburg, and subsequently included 10 other Central Asian and West Asian countries: Azerbaijan Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkey, Ukraine, Belarus, Oman, Syria and Bulgaria as an observer.
It envisions a 7,200-km-long multimode network of ship, rail and road route for transporting freight, aimed at reducing the carriage cost between India and Russia by about 30 percent and bringing down the transit time from 40 days by more than half.
Russian Deputy Industry and Trade Minister Choriyev Ergashevich called the INSTC a “very important corridor for the development of freight traffic in the region,” and suggested that member countries could also work on the joint design and construction of container ships and railway lines together.